(1) The Department of Education website lists details of providers, nominated supervisors and other individuals who have pled guilty to or who have been found guilty or convicted of offences under education and care services legislation. For each calendar year from 2020 to 2024, how many prosecutions were brought which are not listed on the site because they did not result in a finding of guilt or a conviction?
(a) In each calendar year from 2020 to 2024, how many breaches of the national law or regulations were not pursued as prosecutions due to a settlement or other agreement being entered into with the party or parties who would otherwise have been prosecuted against?
(b) Who is responsible for determining which breaches of the National Law are prosecuted and which are not?
(i) On what basis is that decision made?
(2) For each calendar year from 2020 to 2024, how many providers, nominated supervisors or other individuals brought action against the ECEC (Early Childhood Education and Care) Regulatory Authority or the Department in NCAT (New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal) in relation to an enforcement action, such as a compliance notice, prohibition notice or cancellation or suspension, taken against them by the ECEC Regulatory Authority?
(a) How many of those NCAT cases were decided in favour of the applicant?
(b) How many of those NCAT cases did not proceed to a decision because the Department or the ECEC Regulatory Authority entered into a settlement or other agreement with the applicant?
(c) In relation to any settlement or other agreement with the applicant in the course of NCAT proceedings, how many involved a confidentiality provision, suppression order or similar?
(i) How many involved the execution of an Enforceable Undertaking by the applicant?
(3) Other Australian jurisdictions, such as Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia, provide far more detailed information in relation to enforcement actions and regulator activities under the National Law and Regulations than New South Wales does, for example, the Department's site does not even disclose the name of the party entering into an enforceable undertaking. Whose decision was it to disclose limited information only?
(a) When was this decision first made?
(b) When was this decision last considered?
(c) Why was the decision made to continue to disclose less information than other states and territories?
(d) Are there any Enforceable Undertakings or other enforcement actions which are not listed on the New South Wales website because of confidentiality obligations or suppression orders?
(4) Among other things, the New South Wales ECEC Regulatory Authority Sector Survey 2024 key findings showed that almost one in four respondents were unable to agree that regulatory officers "acted fairly and without bias", and over 40 per cent of respondents could not agree that the Regulatory Authority understood the current issues and needs of the sector. What specific actions are the Regulatory Authority and the Department taking to address these findings?
(a) Were these findings considered when making a decision to transfer the Regulatory Authority to a different section of the Department structurally?