Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Majority Jury Verdicts

Majority Jury Verdicts

Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion.
Briefing Paper 06/1996 by Gareth Griffith

The purpose of this briefing paper is to review the arguments for and against the introduction of majority jury verdicts and to include a commentary on other comparable jurisdictions. The New South Wales Law Reform Commission supported the requirement for unanimous verdicts in criminal cases in 1986, this principle of unanimity being upheld by the High Court in Cheatle v R. On the other hand, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia and the Northern Territory have all opted for majority verdicts.