(1) In relation to the report 'NSW Health elective surgery waitlist review' dated 26 September 2024, which found that at Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD) "there are internal perceived pressures to avoid breaches", "clinical reviews which resulted in a Clinical Urgency Category decrease were noted to be influenced by non-patient factors such as resourcing constraints or likelihood of exceeding the maximum recommended procedure period", and that "HNELHD specialties had a substantially higher variance between the reported and recalculated breach rates compared to state average", what is now being done to ensure elective surgery waitlist data is accurate?
(a) What is now being done to ensure elective surgery waitlist data is comparable between Local Health Districts?
(2) Is the Ministry aware of the findings mentioned in question one, or similar findings, occurring in any other Local Health Districts?
(3) What is being done by the Ministry to ensure that real or perceived pressures to avoid breaches are not having unintended consequences on resourcing or patient health outcomes?
(4) What action is the Ministry taking to ensure that clinical urgency categories will only be adjusted in the interest of patient outcomes?