Conveyancers Licensing Bill



About this Item
SpeakersShaw The Hon Jeffrey; Kirkby The Hon Elisabeth; Hannaford The Hon John
BusinessBill, Division, In Committee, Amendment

CONVEYANCERS LICENSING BILL
In Committee

Part 1

The Hon. J. W. SHAW [5.18], by leave: I move the following amendments in globo:
      Page 2, clause 4, lines 24 and 25. Omit "residential property or that otherwise affects residential property", insert instead: "real property, or that otherwise affects real property (other than real property that comprises offices or buildings consisting of more than 4 floors, or more than 10 retail shops, or that is licensed under the Liquor Act 1982)".
      Page 3, clause 4, lines 9 and 10. Omit "residential property", insert instead "real property".
      Page 3, clause 4, lines 34-36. Omit all words on those lines.

The rationale of the various amendments has been explained in the second reading debate and I do not propose to trouble the Committee with any detailed or lengthy explanation of them in policy terms. This group of amendments effectively will widen the range of property with which the non-solicitor conveyancers could deal. It will delete the definition of residential property from clause 4 of the bill and will substitute the term "real property". However, it also contains some limitations on the classes of real property with which such conveyancers will be able to deal, that is, particularly restrictions in relation to certain commercial property. The amendments are consistent with the arguments put by the Labor Opposition in the second reading debate.

The Hon. ELISABETH KIRKBY [5.19]: I wish to place upon the record that these amendments moved in globo by the Hon. J. W. Shaw -

The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN (The Hon. Beryl Evans): Order! I cannot hear the honourable member, and I must be able to hear what the honourable member is saying.

The Hon. ELISABETH KIRKBY: The amendments will allow conveyancers to handle large rural properties as well as carry out commercial conveyancing and residential conveyancing. The Australian Democrats do not believe that licensed
Page 6262
conveyancers would have the expertise to handle rural properties or commercial properties in which a great deal of money could be invested by the purchaser. For that reason the Australian Democrats will not support the amendments moved by the Opposition.

The Hon. J. P. HANNAFORD (Attorney General, and Minister for Industrial Relations) [5.20]: The Government also opposes the amendments as circulated. The arguments against these amendments were canvassed in some detail in my second reading speech. I make the point that the limitation to residential property of up to 10 hectares reflects the fact that this is the scope of work within which conveyancers operate at present, and thus within their knowledge. To go beyond that would increase the risk to the client concerned, to which the Hon. Elisabeth Kirkby adverted. Non-residential property conveyancing as a general rule is more complex and carries the possibility of ancillary transactions that add to the complexity and difficulty of the matter. To illustrate, the sale of a small shop almost always will involve also the sale of a business or stock in trade. The sale of a rural property may involve the sale of stock. Such matters require training and qualifications not held by persons currently involved in conveyancing and beyond those proposed for conveyancers. Licensed conveyancers have been introduced by the Government in response to consumer demand. In the main that demand has been associated with domestic conveyancing. It must be questioned whether additional training and qualifications that would be required to undertake non-residential conveyancing would be of any benefit to the consumer, having in mind the volume of matters that might be involved. The Government therefore opposes the amendments.

Question - That the amendments be agreed to - put.

The Committee divided.
Ayes, 14

          Mrs Arena
          Dr Burgmann
          Mr Enderbury
          Mrs Isaksen
          Mr Kaldis


          Mrs Kite
          Mr Macdonald
          Mr Manson
          Mr Obeid
          Mr Shaw


          Mr Vaughan
          Mrs Walker
          Tellers,
          Ms Burnswoods
          Mrs Symonds
      Noes, 18

          Mrs Chadwick
          Mr Coleman
          Mrs Forsythe
          Miss Gardiner
          Mr Hannaford
          Mr Jobling
          Mr Jones


          Miss Kirkby
          Mr Moppett
          Mr Mutch
          Mrs Nile
          Revd F. J. Nile
          Dr Pezzutti
          Mr Samios


          Mr Rowland Smith
          Mr Webster


          Tellers,
          Mr Ryan
          Mrs Sham-Ho
      Pairs

                Mr Dyer
                Mr Egan
                Mr Johnson
                Mr O'Grady

                Mr Bull
                Dr Goldsmith
                Mr Pickering
                Mr Willis

      Page 6263

      Question so resolved in the negative.

      Amendments negatived.

      Part agreed to.

      Part 2

      The Hon. J. P. HANNAFORD (Attorney General, and Minister for Industrial Relations) [5.28]: I move:
            Page 11, clause 20, lines 10-15. Omit all words on those lines, insert instead:
            (3) A licence may not be suspended or cancelled (otherwise than on a ground referred to in subsection (1)(a), (c) or (j)) unless:
                (a) the Committee concurs with the proposed suspension or cancellation; or
                (b) the Council is of the opinion that there has been, or that there may have been, a failure to account (within the meaning of Part 5) by the Licensee.

      As I have already noted in relation to clause 20(3), in the other place the Government and the Opposition each moved an amendment to the clause. The result is that the clause as it stands at present is contradictory and unworkable. The clause deals with the power granted to the Law Society to suspend or cancel a licence. It is the Government's view that the Law Society should be required to consult with the Conveyancers Licensing Committee prior to taking action to suspend or cancel a licence on the grounds set out in clause 20(1) of the bill, particularly in circumstances where the council would have a discretion to take such action. The Opposition amendment requires the council to obtain the consent of the committee prior to taking such action. It is the view of the Government that this additional layer of regulation is unnecessary and may delay appropriate action being taken. Nevertheless, the Government is willing to accept this amendment rather than further delay the passage of this legislation.

      Accordingly, the amendment to clause 20 that I propose to move will accept the Opposition amendment and merely reword clause 20 to ensure that it is workable. Those who argue for a more involved role for the committee must be aware of the impact this may have on the fees payable by conveyancers. The functions undertaken by the Law Society will represent a substantial subsidy by the Law Society. Indeed, the value of services provided by the Law Society will probably amount to a subsidy of hundreds of thousands of dollars. If the functions are given to the Conveyancers Licensing Committee, it will require substantial administrative support. To impose the full administrative burden on the industry would be quite crippling and would not enable the scheme to get off the ground. The Government is relying greatly upon the Law Society to make this legislation work. In moving this amendment I wish to put on record my belief that the Law Society Council will discharge its functions impartially and responsibly. I commend the amendment to the Committee.

      The Hon. J. W. SHAW [5.30]: The Opposition does not oppose this amendment.

      The Hon. ELISABETH KIRKBY [5.31]: I wish to place on record the reason for the Australian Democrats supporting this amendment. At present the bill requires the Law Society Council to consult with the Conveyancers Licensing Committee before it suspends or cancels a licence in response to a complaint. However, this amendment,
      Page 6264
      which originally was to be moved by the Opposition but has been taken on board by the Government, would make it necessary for the Law Society Council to obtain the concurrence of the CLC before it suspends or cancels a licence. When I saw the original amendment, which I should have supported had it been moved by the Opposition, a number of arguments remained to be evaluated. On the one hand, it is essential for conveyancers to be subject to the same standards as solicitors; on the other hand, there is a perceived conflict of interest in having the Law Society in charge of regulating conveyancers. The conflict of interest issue is acknowledged to a certain extent in the existing legislation in that originally, before this amendment was proposed by the Government, the Law Society Council was to consult with the CLC before suspending or cancelling a licence. Furthermore, mechanisms would be put in place to allow an appeal against the decision of the Law Society Council.

      Reviews of council decisions are conducted by the Legal Profession Conduct Review Panel, which is constituted by one licensee and two lay members nominated by the chairperson of the panel. The panel is entitled to look at the record of the council's investigation of the complaint and all other documents held by the council in relation to that investigation. The panel may uphold the decision or recommend that the matter be taken up by either the Legal Profession Standards Board or the Legal Profession Disciplinary Tribunal. The Opposition argued that the conflict of interest was such that it was necessary for the Law Society to obtain the consent of the CLC for disciplinary action. The Australian Democrats believe it is proper to support this extra safeguard to ensure that the views of the CLC are genuinely taken into account. My view was based on a letter dated 8th September I received from the Law Consumers Association signed for the President, M. E. Burgess. The letter stated:
            Of further concern has been the repetition of investigations of conveyancers by the Law Society. On at least two occasions, the Law Society has given undertakings of a moratorium in this respect to both the Association of Property Conveyancers and the Attorney General pending the passage of legislation. As recently as whilst the debate was in progress last week -

      As the letter is dated 8th September, that means the beginning of this month:
            - the Law Society commenced an investigation of an alleged breach by a conveyancing company at Penrith. It is clear from this behaviour by this "honourable" Society, that the Association of Property Conveyancers is rightly concerned about the conduct of the Society in its official role under the Licensed Conveyancers Bill. The amendment carried in the Parliament requiring the concurrence of the Conveyancers Committee is a very necessary amendment in the circumstances and must be retained.

      I am glad that the Government has seen fit to agree with the Law Consumers Association and has introduced the amendment.

      Amendment agreed to.

      Part as amended agreed to.

      Part 7 and schedule 1

      The Hon. J. W. SHAW [5.36], by leave: I move the following amendments in globo:
            Page 65, clause 147, line 31. Omit "7", insert instead "8".
            Page 66, clause 147, lines 5 and 6. Omit all words on those lines, insert instead:
                (d) 1 is to be appointed from a panel of at least 2 members of the New South Wales Farmers'
      Page 6265
      Association nominated by that Association; and
                (e) 1 is to be a person who, in the opinion of the Minister, has appropriate qualifications and experience in business or commerce.
            Page 74, Schedule 1, line 34. Omit "4", insert instead "5".

      These amendments are designed to give the New South Wales Farmers Association nominee representation on the Conveyancers Licensing Committee established by clause 146 of the bill. The amendments are essentially to clause 147, not to take away the classes of persons contemplated by the bill as being on the committee but to add to the existing representatives a rural representative.

      The Hon. ELISABETH KIRKBY [5.37]: The Australian Democrats do not support the Opposition amendment to include a representative of the New South Wales Farmers Association on the CLC. The bill already provides for two consumer representatives on the CLC. Though farmers are significant consumers of conveyancing services, there is no specific reason why the New South Wales Farmers Association should receive special treatment over and above that of other consumer groups and be permanently represented on the CLC. Real estate agents, members of the Law Consumers Association and the Australian Consumers Association may well argue that they have an equal right to be represented. If these amendments are supported, those people could argue that quite successfully. It should be remembered that conveyancers will not be dealing with properties greater than 10 hectares. Therefore the Australian Democrats do not support this amendment.

      The Hon. J. P. HANNAFORD (Attorney General, and Minister for Industrial Relations) [5.38]: The Government joins with the Democrats in not supporting the amendment. The Conveyancers Licensing Committee is crucial to the successful operation of the legislation. The membership of the committee represents a proper balance between various interests. Quite properly, it has both solicitor and conveyancer representatives. It is proposed that the committee will have two representatives of the Association of Property Conveyancers, two representatives of the Law Society, two representatives of the community and an independent chair. The Government believes that this is an appropriate balance. I suggest that it is not appropriate for representatives of the community to represent narrow or sectional interests. They should have regard to consumers generally, whether located in the city or country centres. The Government is committed to making this legislation work. It is recognised that it is crucial that all people appointed to that body are also committed to making the legislation work and to making decisions in the public interest. These considerations will be the most important factors for appointment to the committee. That will be the approach taken by the Government. I therefore oppose the amendment.

      Question - That the amendments be agreed to - put.

      The Committee divided.
      Ayes, 14

          Mrs Arena
          Dr Burgmann
          Ms Burnswoods
          Mr Dyer
          Mr Enderbury

          Mr Kaldis
          Mrs Kite
          Mr Manson
          Mr Obeid
          Mr Shaw

          Mrs Symonds
          Mrs Walker
          Tellers,
          Mrs Isaksen
          Mr Macdonald


      Page 6266
      Noes, 18

          Mrs Chadwick
          Mr Coleman
          Mrs Forsythe
          Mr Hannaford
          Mr Jobling
          Mr Jones
          Miss Kirkby

          Mr Moppett
          Mrs Nile
          Revd F. J. Nile
          Dr Pezzutti
          Mr Ryan
          Mr Samios
          Mrs Sham-Ho

          Mr Rowland Smith
          Mr Webster


          Tellers,
          Miss Gardiner
          Mr Mutch
      Pairs

                Mr Egan
                Mr Johnson
                Mr O'Grady
                Mr Vaughan

                Mr Bull
                Dr Goldsmith
                Mr Pickering
                Mr Willis

      Question so resolved in the negative.

      Amendments negatived.

      Part and schedule agreed to.

      New schedule 3

      The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN (The Hon. Beryl Evans): Order! Both the Attorney General and the Hon. J. W. Shaw have circulated amendments. I suggest that both amendments be debated and separate questions put at the conclusion of the debate.

      The Hon. J. P. HANNAFORD (Attorney General, and Minister for Industrial Relations) [5.43]: I move:
            Page 79. After line 38, insert:
      SCHEDULE 3 - SAVINGS, TRANSITIONAL AND OTHER PROVISIONS
(Sec. 164)
        Part 1 - Preliminary

        Regulations
            1. (1) The regulations may include provisions of a savings or transitional nature consequent on the enactment of this Act.
            (2) A provision referred to in subclause (1) may, if the regulations so provide, take effect from the commencement of this Act or from a later date.
            (3) To the extent to which a provision referred to in subclause (1) takes effect from a date that is earlier than the date of its publication in the Gazette, the provision does not operate:
            (a) to affect, in a manner prejudicial to any person (other than the State or an authority of the State), the rights of that person existing before the date of its publication; or
            (b) to impose liabilities on any person (other than the State or an authority of the State), in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of its publication.


        Page 6267
        Part 2 - Provisions consequent on enactment of this Act

        Definition
            2. (1) in this Part:
                    pointed day", in relation to a provision of this Part, means the day occurring 12 months after the date of assent or such earlier day as may be appointed by proclamation for the purposes of that provision.
            (2) The Governor may make proclamations for the purposes of the provisions of this Part.

        Interim constitution of the Committee
            3. The members of the Committee referred to in section 147(1)(b) are, until the appointed day, to comprise the Director-General of the Attorney General's Department and the Director of the Land Titles Office, rather than 2 licensees nominated by the Association.

        Interim constitution of the Panel
            4. For the purposes of section 114, the Panel is, until the appointed day, to be constituted by 1 of its solicitor members and 2 of its lay members rather than by 1 of its licensee members and 2 of its lay members, and is to include (as an additional member) the Director of the Land Titles Office.

        Interim constitution of the Board
            5. For the purposes of section 118, the Board is, until the appointed day, to be constituted by 2 of its solicitor members and 1 of its lay members rather than by 1 of its solicitor members, 1 of its licensee members and 1 of its lay members, and is to include (as an additional member) the Director of the Land Titles Office.

        Interim constitution of the Tribunal
            6. For the purposes of sections 127 and 132, the Tribunal is, until the appointed day, to be constituted by 2 of its solicitor members and 1 of its lay members rather than by 1 of its solicitor members, 1 of its licensee members and 1 of its lay members, and is to include (as an additional member) the Director of the Land Titles Office.

        Interim certificates of eligibility
            7. (1) For the purposes of Division 2 of Part 2, any person:
                (a) who was conducting a conveyancing business (as a principal of the business or as a person responsible for the day to day management of the business) immediately before the commencement of Part 2; and
                (b) who had conducted a conveyancing business (as a principal of the business or as a person responsible for the day to day management of the business) for at least 2 years prior to 1 March 1992; and
                (c) who, when applying for a certificate of eligibility to hold a licence, satisfies the Committee that the person is sufficiently knowledgeable in relation to the law and practice of conveyancing to warrant being granted a licence by virtue of this clause,
            is, subject to section 5, qualified to hold a licence even if the person does not have the educational qualifications, practical training or conveyancing experience approved by the Committee for the purposes of Part 2.
            (2) The Committee may, for the purposes of this clause, examine any applicant as to his or her knowledge in relation to the law and practice of conveyancing and cause an inspection to be made of the accounts in relation to his or her conveyancing business.
            (3) A person is not entitled to be granted a certificate of eligibility to hold a licence by virtue
        Page 6268
        of this clause unless the person lodges an application for such a certificate within 6 months after the commencement of Part 2.
            (4) A member of the Committee (as constituted in accordance with clause 3) is not entitled to be granted a certificate of eligibility to hold a licence by virtue of this clause.

        As a result of amendments in the other place there are no transitional provisions in the bill as introduced into this House. The proposed amendment will overcome that incredible situation. The purpose of the transitional provisions as originally included in the legislation is to recognise that some of the persons currently involved in conveyancing will not meet the qualification and practical training requirements that are to be set by the Conveyancers Licensing Committee. The transitional arrangement is, therefore, a means by which a person with some experience in conveyancing but without any qualifications may nevertheless obtain a licence. In this respect it is a significant concession to the persons concerned. However, clearly, there must be some restrictions to ensure that persons who may offer their service to the public are competent and have sufficient experience to ensure that they are not a risk to the public. The transitional provisions will allow a person who can satisfy the Conveyancers Licensing Committee of his competence and who has had at least two years' experience in the conduct of a conveyancing business prior to 1st March to obtain a transitional licence. The Government is firmly of the view that this is a reasonable benchmark for an applicant to rely on in order to demonstrate that he has gained the requisite knowledge and experience. It must be noted that the necessary experience goes to the conduct of a conveyancing business. Merely having undertaken conveyancing transactions under the supervision of another person without any of the responsibility involved is not sufficient experience for the purpose of being allowed to conduct a conveyancing business. A person, such as a clerk in a solicitor's office, who has undertaken conveyancing on this basis will not be eligible to apply for a transitional licence. I commend the amendment to the House.

        The Hon. J. W. SHAW [5.45]: I move:
            Page 79. After line 37, insert:
        SCHEDULE 3 - SAVINGS, TRANSITIONAL AND OTHER PROVISIONS
(Sec. 164)
        Part 1 - Preliminary
            Regulations
            1. (1) The regulations may include provisions of a savings or transitional nature consequent on the enactment of this Act.
            (2) A provision referred to in subclause (1) may, if the regulations so provide, take effect from the commencement of this Act or from a later date.
            (3) To the extent to which a provision referred to in subclause (1) takes effect from a date that is earlier than the date of its publication in the Gazette, the provision does not operate:
                (a) to affect, in a manner prejudicial to any person (other than the State or an authority of the State), the rights of that person existing before the date of its publication; or
                (b) to impose liabilities on any person (other than the State or an authority of the State), in respect of anything done or omitted to be done before the date of its publication.


        Page 6269
        Part 2 - Provisions consequent on enactment of this Act
            Definition
            2.(1) In this Part:
                    pointed day", in relation to a provision of this Part, means the day occurring 12 months after the date of assent or such earlier day as may be appointed by proclamation for the purposes of that provision.
            (2) The Governor may make proclamations for the purposes of the provisions of this Part.
            Interim constitution of the Committee
            3. The members of the Committee referred to in section 147(1)(b) are, until the appointed day, to comprise the Director-General of the Attorney General's Department and the Director of the Land Titles Office, rather than 2 licensees nominated by the Association.
            Interim constitution of the Panel
            4. For the purposes of section 114, the Panel is, until the appointed day, to be constituted by 1 of its solicitor members and 2 of its lay members rather than by 1 of its licensee members and 2 of its lay members.
            Interim constitution of the Board
            5. For the purposes of section 118, the Board is, until the appointed day, to be constituted by 2 of its solicitor members and 1 of its lay members rather than by 1 of its solicitor members, 1 of its licensee members and 1 of its lay members.
            Interim constitution of the Tribunal
            6. For the purposes of sections 127 and 132, the Tribunal is, until the appointed day, to be constituted by 2 of its solicitor members and 1 of its lay members rather than by 1 of its solicitor members, 1 of its licensee members and 1 of its lay members.
            Interim certificates of eligibility
            7.(1) for the purposes of Division 2 of Part 2, any person:
            (a) who:
                    (i) at the commencement of this clause, had conducted a conveyancing business, as a principal of the business, for at least 2 years prior to the commencement of this clause; or
                    (ii) had, in some capacity, gained experience in the law and practice of conveyancing that the Committee in its discretion determines to be of significance for the purposes of this clause; and
            (b) who, when applying for a certificate of eligibility to hold a licence, satisfies the Committee that the person is sufficiently knowledgeable in relation to the law and practice of conveyancing to warrant being granted a licence by virtue of this clause, is, subject to section 5, qualified to hold a licence even if the person does not have the educational qualifications, practical training or conveyancing experience approved by the Committee for the purposes of Part 2.
            (2) The Committee may, for the purposes of this clause, examine any applicant as to his or her knowledge in relation to the law and practice of conveyancing and cause an inspection to be made of the accounts in relation to his or her conveyancing business.
            (3) A person is not entitled to be granted a certificate of eligibility to hold a licence by virtue of this clause unless the person lodges an application for such a certificate within 6 months after the commencement of Part 2.
            (4) A member of the Committee (as constituted in accordance with clause 3) is not entitled to be granted a certificate of eligibility to hold a licence by virtue of this clause.


        Page 6270
        It is common ground that the bill should contain a schedule 3. The essential difference is the flexibility of the qualifications to obtain an interim certificate of eligibility. The Opposition's amendments differ from those of the Government in that the Opposition would allow a person who has been conducting a conveyancing business for at least two years prior to the commencement of the clause to have an interim certificate of eligibility. It seems probable that the new law will not take effect until January 1993, which will mean a conveyancer would have to have been in business for 33 months in order to qualify for an interim certificate under the Government's proposal. The Opposition would make the test two years prior to the date of the commencement, that is, including a somewhat wider class and making the qualification system more flexible. In addition, and importantly, we would give the committee discretion to deal with a special hard case. In other words, we would say the committee should not be rigidly bound by objective criteria but should be able to say that, where a person had in some capacity gained experience of the law and practice of conveyancing, the committee in its discretion would be able to determine that that was of sufficient weight or significance to allow that person to be considered to qualify for the purpose of obtaining an interim certificate. Usually in tribunals of this nature it is advisable to give them that flexibility to deal with special circumstances rather than to constrain them rigidly by absolute standards.

        The Hon. ELISABETH KIRKBY [5.50]: I support the amendment moved by the Government and I indicate I shall not be supporting the amendment moved by the Opposition. The bill as it stands restricts the issuing of interim licences to people who have conducted a conveyancing business for two years as at 1st March, 1992. I am given to understand that 45 people in New South Wales will be eligible for licences under the transitional arrangements. Then there will be no new conveyancers for a further two years until a course of study has been developed and applicants have undertaken it successfully. This is a very complicated issue, I agree, but the overriding principle should be strict consumer protection. The provision would allow only the most senior conveyancers in existing conveyancing firms to be granted interim licences. I believe that the Government amendment clarifies this situation. Only someone who was conducting a conveyancing business as a principal of the business or as a person responsible for the day-to-day management of the business will be eligible for an interim certificate of eligibility. Clerks in solicitors' offices are to be specifically excluded from holding interim certification and I believe that this is highly appropriate.

        The Opposition has suggested that its amendment is more reasonable and flexible. The two years' experience is taken from the date of the commencement of the legislation rather than 1st March, 1992. All those people who have in some capacity gained experience in the law and practice of conveyancing that the committee in its discretion determines to be of significance for the purpose of this clause would be eligible for an interim certificate. One of the main reasons why I support this bill is that it will introduce standard qualifications for conveyancers and will tighten the professional standards applicable to conveyancers. The interim provisions will allow conveyancers to operate on the basis of professional experience rather than specific educational qualifications. They will continue to operate because they already have an established business at stake but I believe that educational qualifications are a requisite for entry into certain professions for very good reason. It does not make sense to me to permit new conveyancing businesses to be set up without those conveyancers being adequately trained. There has been a great deal of talk in this debate and in the media about breaking a monopoly. However, I do not believe that we should forget professional standards in a rush to have conveyancers compete with solicitors for conveyancing. I certainly believe that the tighter the regulation, the better. I support the Government's amendment.

        Page 6271

        Question - That the amendment by the Hon. J. P. Hannaford be agreed to - put.

        The Committee divided.
        Ayes, 18

          Mrs Chadwick
          Mrs Forsythe
          Miss Gardiner
          Mr Hannaford
          Mr Jobling
          Mr Jones
          Miss Kirkby

          Mr Moppett
          Mr Mutch
          Mrs Nile
          Revd F. J. Nile
          Mr Ryan
          Mr Samios
          Mrs Sham-Ho

          Mr Rowland Smith
          Mr Webster


          Tellers,
          Mr Coleman
          Dr Pezzutti
        Noes, 14

          Mrs Arena
          Ms Burnswoods
          Mr Dyer
          Mr Enderbury
          Mrs Isaksen

          Mr Kaldis
          Mrs Kite
          Mr Macdonald
          Mr Obeid
          Mr Shaw

          Mrs Symonds
          Mr Vaughan
          Tellers,
          Dr Burgmann
          Mrs Walker
        Pairs

                Mr Bull
                Dr Goldsmith
                Mr Pickering
                Mr Willis

                Mr Egan
                Mr Johnson
                Mr Manson
                Mr O'Grady

        Question so resolved in the affirmative.

        Amendment agreed to.

        The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN (The Hon. Beryl Evans): Order! As the Committee has agreed to the schedule, I cannot accept the amendment moved by the Opposition.

        New schedule agreed to.

        Bill reported from Committee with amendments and report adopted.