1. Home
  2. Hansard & Papers
  3. Legislative Assembly
  4. 18 October 2005
Contact Print this page Reduce font size Increase font size

Consideration of Urgent Motions

Printing Tips | Print selected text | Full Day Hansard Transcript         « Prior Item | Item 26 of 40 | Next Item »

About this Item
Subjects -  Handicapped and Disabled; Parliament: New South Wales; Rural Industry; Wheat and Grain; Government Department: New South Wales: Community Services: DOCS
Speakers - Black Mr Peter; Debnam Mr Peter
Business - Consideration of Urgent Motion, Division, Motion
Commentary - Procedural Debate to determine precedence


    CONSIDERATION OF URGENT MOTIONS
Page: 18770


    Rice Industry

    Mr PETER BLACK (Murray-Darling) [7.30 p.m.]: Last night and this morning have been most unsettling for our rice industry because of a decision that was made yesterday. We are refusing to cop the $26 million fine that has been established by the Commonwealth Government if we continue to support the vesting arrangements. I remind the House that in previous debates we have recognised that the rice industry in the electorates of Murray-Darling and Murrumbidgee provides 8,000 jobs and an annual turnover of $800 million. Those two electorates provide 98 per cent of Australia's rice crop. The Commonwealth Government now says—and this is a decision made by the New South Wales Cabinet yesterday—that if we continue to support the vesting arrangements it will fine us $20 million. Nothing could be more urgent today than this matter. I challenge The Nationals to vote with the Government to bring this matter on and properly discuss it.

    We have seen the persistent failure of successive Nationals Ministers for Agriculture to address this matter. We have seen the persistent failure of the honourable member for Murrumbidgee—Australopithecus Murrumbidgee Encephalitis—to support us in this matter: a $26 million fine, on which the Federal Liberal Party is supporting The Nationals. This morning the rice industry approached the following Federal members—and, by the way, not one of them was a Liberal—Nick Minchin, who has already been down to the Riverina; Peter McGauran; Kay Hull, who was a magnificent member for Riverina, and it is a pity some of her colleagues did not stand up for the rice industry in the same way she has—and that is coming from me; and Mark Vaile, whom I knew in another time as the shadow Minister for Roads. In my view, Kay Hull is one of the few decent Federal Nats in this State, probably because she was the deputy mayor of Wagga Wagga—she had a background in local government.

    This matter is urgent because, despite all the toing and froing today and yesterday, on 1 September I had the pleasure of taking our new Premier down to Deniliquin. We toured the rice mill, where we had a presentation and said we would support the rice industry at the State level. Nothing has come from the State or Federal Nationals, with the exception of Kay Hull, who I remind the House crossed the floor on the subject of Telstra and who also, ironically, supported me on the issue of exceptional circumstances drought assistance for rice growers and got into trouble with the infamous John Cobb because of it.

    The rice industry has had enough of the drought, and now, apparently after the drought, it is the Commonwealth Government's turn. We have said no to a fine of $26 million. It is up to The Nationals to do something about this. The National Party used to be the regulators and they are voting for the abolition of a single desk, which the entire rice industry has voted to maintain. They have seen the vertical integration of the rice industry, which has been most important. This has all been sold down the river today by the Federal Nationals, who do not care, and a State Nationals member who will not stand up for his own people. That is why this matter is urgent. We have the most efficient rice industry in the world standing up to heavily subsidised crops in places like Thailand and California. This motion is urgent because the New South Wales Government decided yesterday not to cop the $26 million fine, and as of this morning we still do not have a decision from the Commonwealth Government or The Nationals as to what they are going to do about our support for the single desk.

    Respite Care Services

    Mr PETER DEBNAM (Vaucluse—Leader of the Opposition) [7.35 p.m.]: Let us talk about something that is urgent. I gave notice of a motion this afternoon which states:

    That this House condemns the Iemma Government for cutting funds and betraying families who depend on respite care for the profoundly disabled.

    This motion is urgent because this week is Carers Week. The Government has sold down the drain any sense of compassion or care. Honourable members opposite should understand what the Government is doing. This motion is urgent because of the Premier's words on 2 August:

    My light on the hill, my long-term ambition, my point of passion and conviction is to commit myself to making progress on three special areas of social policy—public and affordable housing, mental health and the care and assistance for the disabled. These are matters of simple decency.

    Those were the words of the Premier on 2 August. The motion is urgent because of what the Minister for Disability Services, John Della Bosca, said in the upper House on 13 September. He stated:

    The important thing to understand in respect to the provision of respite services is that they are in fact a critical means of preventing people requiring eventual full-time accommodation services because of family burnout and fatigue, and that the inability to get respite eventually means people will need more permanent accommodation.

    Last Friday, when he was sprung for betraying families, he said:

    The closure of respite services at Greystanes will be delayed until the end of February next year.

    That was a Government press release on 14 October. We should listen to what families want the Government to talk about. What is Greystanes? Why is it urgent?

    Mr Gerard Martin: I know all about Greystanes. I have been at meetings with them all week while you've been on your yacht, Commodore Peter.

    Mr PETER DEBNAM: the honourable member for Bathurst should know about it but he does do not; he has betrayed them. Greystanes has provided a number of different services for the past 30 years. It is currently home to 30 profoundly disabled young people, who live there permanently. There are rooms allocated for respite care, for families who need to drop off their child to have a break for a day or two. There is also a day care service where the young people go to have fun, paint, listen to music and do other activities. The Government's plan is that by 21 October—Friday of this week—the 30 permanent residents will move into seven group homes in the community, the respite service will close and day care will be the only service left. At present only three people have been offered respite care at Marsden, near Ryde. People from Bathurst, Dubbo and Orange have not yet been offered anything.

    Many are convinced that the only way to get any help after 21 October is if they abandon their child at Greystanes or another institution to force the Government's hand. Two families have already done this. The honourable member for Bathurst has betrayed families and profoundly disabled kids. That is not surprising because the Government is doing this day after day. That is why my motion is urgent and why Labor is under such pressure in the community. The community just cannot stand to think of Labor having another four years in government.

    If honourable members opposite did not watch Stateline on Friday or Saturday, they should get a copy of the tape and have a look at the damage caused by the Premier and the Minister, not only to the people of New South Wales but to the reputation of the Australian Labor Party. They should talk to Catherine Murray, Sally Mannering and also John Ryan, the shadow Minister, who has pursued this issue while Government members have been asleep. The point he made is that the Government's hollow promises on Friday actually gave hope to a lot of people who, in fact, will get none under this Government.

    Question—That the motion for urgent consideration of the honourable member for Murray-Darling be proceeded with—put.

    The House divided.

    Ayes, 45
    Ms Allan
    Mr Amery
    Ms Andrews
    Mr Bartlett
    Ms Beamer
    Mr Black
    Mr Brown
    Ms Burney
    Miss Burton
    Mr Campbell
    Mr Chaytor
    Mr Collier
    Mr Corrigan
    Mr Crittenden
    Mr Daley
    Mr Gaudry
    Mr Gibson
    Ms Hay
    Mr Hickey
    Mr Hunter
    Ms Judge
    Ms Keneally
    Mr Lynch
    Mr McBride
    Mr McLeay
    Ms Meagher
    Ms Megarrity
    Mr Mills
    Mr Morris
    Mr Newell
    Ms Nori
    Mrs Paluzzano
    Mr Pearce
    Mrs Perry
    Ms Saliba
    Mr Sartor
    Mr Stewart
    Ms Tebbutt
    Mr Tripodi
    Mr Watkins
    Mr West
    Mr Whan
    Mr Yeadon

    Tellers,
    Mr Ashton
    Mr Martin
    Noes, 28
    Mr Aplin
    Mr Armstrong
    Mr Barr
    Mr Constance
    Mr Debnam
    Mr Draper
    Mrs Fardell
    Mr Fraser
    Mrs Hancock
    Ms Hodgkinson
    Mrs Hopwood
    Mr Humpherson
    Mr Kerr
    Mr Merton
    Ms Moore
    Mr Oakeshott
    Mr O'Farrell
    Mr Page
    Mr Pringle
    Mr Richardson
    Mr Roberts
    Mrs Skinner
    Mr Slack-Smith
    Mr Stoner
    Mr J. H. Turner
    Mr R. W. Turner

    Tellers,
    Mr George
    Mr Maguire
    Pair
    Mr Price
    Ms Seaton

    Question resolved in the affirmative.


Last modified 05/12/2007 16:31:24   :   Update this page